Sign up for periodic reports and bulletins
FREE access; FREE of commercials; FREE to use
Posted October 17, 2009: by Bill Sardi
If you want assurance that you aren’t going to experience a sudden-death heart attack over the next few years, look not to your cholesterol numbers, but rather your calcium arterial score.
According to the latest study (see chart below), the chances of experiencinga mortal heart attack or stroke over the next 4 years is nearzero if the measure of calcium deposits in your coronary arteriesis zero. On the other hand, if your calcium coronary artery scoreis 1000 or more, you only have ~15% chance of surviving over thenext 4 years. If your calcium artery score is greater than 1000,your risk of dying from a sudden-death heart attack or mortalstroke is ~28 times higher than a people with no calcificationsin their coronary arteries.
CAC = coronaryartery calcium
HR = hazard ratio
p value = statistical significance (lowest number is best)
With realization that sudden cardiac death is frequently the first manifestation of coronary artery disease, and with current technology only able to predict 65—80% of future heart attacks or strokes, and with one study showing just 25% of patients would meet the criteria for statin cholesterol drug therapy the day before theirfirst heart attack, modern medicine is desperately searching fora more reliable approach to predict sudden-death heart attacks.
A growing body of data unequivocally shows that a measure of calcium deposits in coronary arteries is 99% predictive of future heart attacks.1 However, the cholesterol-theory of heart disease prevails andit would be quite an admission that cardiology has been misdirectedfor the past five decades, a concession that modern medicine isstill not ready to accept. But the fact that cardiac care costsmore than $475 billion a year may force stronger justificationof all the technologies employed to prevent and treat heart disease.
With cardiology not budging away from its cholesterol mantra, cardiac imaging centers that perform assessments of calcification of coronary arteries are unfairly being questioned for their exorbitant cost— in the billions of dollars. These coronary CT-scans do subjectpatients to radiation equivalent to quite a few chest x-rays,but they more accurately predict future heart attacks and strokesthan other assessment tools. (Coronary artery calcium scores of0 indicate no plaque; 1—9 minimal; 10—99 mild; 100—399moderate; 400—999 extensive; and 1,000 or more very extensiveplaque.) According to the most recent study, about 100 adultswould have to be screened to find 8 with coronary artery calciumscores indicative of a high risk for a heart attack or stroke.2 Albeit, a coronary calcium score of zero is 99% reliable in predicting10-year survival of patients with no cardiac symptoms.3
Naturalantidotes to coronary artery calcification are: